Drilling & Production Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 69-73.DOI: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2021.01.15

• PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Permeability Prediction Model of Tight Oil Reservoir after Fracturing         

YAN Guofeng1, JIANG Qi2, QIAO Guoman3, SHANG Tao2, SUN Weiguo2, HOU Huan2   

  1. 1. No. 1 Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Branch, Mangya, Qinhai 816499, China; 2. No. 5 Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Branch, Mangya, Qinhai 816400, China; 3. Changchun Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Jilin Oilfield Branch, Changchun, Jilin 130000, China
  • Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-25

致密油储层压裂后渗透率预测模型

闫国峰1,姜琪2,乔国满3,尚 涛2,孙未国2,侯欢2   

  1. 1中国石油天然气股份有限公司青海油田分公司采油一厂  2中国石油天然气股份有限公司青海油田分公司采油五厂  3中国石油天然气股份有限公司吉林油田分公司长春采油厂
  • 作者简介:闫国峰(1983-), 硕士,工程师,2012年6月毕业于中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业,主要从事油水井解堵、压裂、防砂、堵水等措施工艺方面的工作。地址: (816499)青海省海西州茫崖市青海油田采油一厂采油工艺研究所,电话:18997377821,E-mail: ygf2002@ 126. com

Abstract:

The characteristics of low permeability and low natural productivity of tight oil reservoirs determine that large-scale hydraulic fracturing is often used to improve reservoir permeability, initial production and ultimate recovery. The reservoir permeability after fracturing is an important parameter to evaluate the hydraulic fracturing effect and single well productivity. At present, the research on the theoretical calculation model of tight oil reservoir permeability after fracturing considering the influence of multiple factors is still insufficient. Most use experimental measurement or well test measurement, which are costly and complicated to operate. Therefore, based on the principle of pressure drop well test, according to the fracturing operation curve, and considering the comprehensive effects of fracturing fluid loss and fracture propagation, this paper established a mathematical model for predicting the permeability after fracturing in tight oil reservoirs, which can directly calculate the permeability after fracturing by using fracturing operation data. Because the mathematical model is more complex, Matlab software is used to solve the problem through the difference dispersion iteration. Based on the actual fracturing data in an onshore area, the calculation and analysis show that the calculated permeability after fracturing is close to the interpreted permeability of well test. But the well test permeability is the effective permeability of the reservoir, which shows that the calculation result of this model is believable. The further analysis shows that the principle of this model is the same as that of the well test, but the difference is that the well test interpretation software can not calculate the permeability of tight oil reservoir after fracturing considering the comprehensive influence of fracturing fluid leakage and fracture propagation, moreover, the well test interpretation software requires parameters to be obtained from the well test admission data, while the calculation model in this paper only needs to record the fracturing operation data during the fracturing process. It can save well test operation time and cost, which can save the time and cost of well test operation. The calculated results will provide a reference for the evaluation of fracturing effect and productivity prediction of tight oil reservoir after fracturing.

Key words: permeability, tight oil, leakage, PKN model, crack propagation

摘要: 致密油储层渗透率、自然产能双低的特点决定了开发致密油时,多采用大型水力压裂改造提高储层渗透率、初始产量以及最终采收率,其中压裂后储层渗透率是评价水力压裂效果和单井产能的重要参数。目前对于考虑多因素影响的致密油储层压裂后渗透率理论计算模型的研究尚有不足,大多利用实验测定或者试井测定,这类方法成本较高且操作较复杂,为此文章基于压降试井测试原理,以压裂施工曲线为基础,考虑压裂液漏失和裂缝扩展综合影响,建立了致密油储层压裂后渗透率预测数学模型,可以直接利用压裂施工数据计算出压裂后的渗透率。由于数学模型较复杂,可利用 MATLAB软件通过差分离散迭代进行求解。以陆上某地区实际压裂数据为依据,经过计算分析表明,模型计算压裂后渗透率与试井解释渗透率较接近,而试井渗透率为储层有效渗透率,说明文章模型计算结果可信。进一步分析可知,模型的原理和试井原理相同,不同之处在于试井解释软件无法计算考虑压裂液漏失和裂缝扩展综合影响的致密油储层压裂后渗透率,而且试井解释软件需要的参数是要进行试井测试录取资料得到,而文章计算模型只需要在压裂过程中录取压裂施工数据即可,可以节约试井作业时间和成本,在实际矿场具有实用性。计算结果为致密油储层在压裂后的压裂效果评价、产能预测等提供了参考依据。

关键词: 渗透率, 致密油, 漏失, PKN, 裂缝扩展